[oracle@mlab2 ~]$ oerr ora 8102 08102, 00000, "index key not found, obj# %s, file %s, block %s (%s)" // *Cause: Internal error: possible inconsistency in index // *Action: Send trace file to your customer support representative, along // with information on reproducing the error
ORA-8102错误出现的原理是当表或者LOB SEGMENT上存在一个键值,但是该键值在索引上却找不到时,则出现错误。
其TRACE部分类似于:
oer 8102.<code> - obj# <object id>, rdba: <rdba value>(afn <file#>, blk# <block#>) kdk key 8102.2: ncol: <number of columns in the key including the rowid>, len: <key length> key: (<length>):<hexadecimal value>
其中 obj#为 受影响对象的object_id, rdba为相对数据块地址,AFN为绝对文件号,blk#为 该key应当存放在的索引的块号。
如下面的例子:
SQL> DELETE dept WHERE deptno=10; DELETE dept WHERE deptno=10 * ERROR at line 1: ORA-08102: index key not found, obj# 46115, file 5, block 90 (2) trace文件中出现: oer 8102.2 - obj# 46115, rdba: 0x02c0005a(afn 5, blk# 90) kdk key 8102.2: ncol: 3, len: 16 key: (16): 06 c5 02 01 01 27 02 04 c3 02 32 33 06 02 c0 00 4a 00 05
首先定位受影响的是哪个索引
错误信息和trace中都指出了受影响的索引的obj#:
SELECT * FROM dba_objects WHERE object_id = 46115;
使用ANALYZE TABLE
VALIDATE STRUCTURE CASCADE;命令来验证,如果确实存在表和索引的不一致则会出现ORA-1499错误:
ANALYZE TABLE
VALIDATE STRUCTURE CASCADE;
也可以选择 通过全表扫描的结果与索引扫描的结果对比:
SELECT /*+ FULL(t1) */ <indexed column list> FROM <Table name> t1 MINUS SELECT /*+ index(t <Index name>) */ <indexed column list> FROM <Table name> t;
例如表名 为 DEPT, Index Name 为I_DEPT1, 索引I_DEPT1 上的字段为DEPTNO, DNAME.
SELECT /*+ FULL(t1) */ deptno, dname FROM dept t1 MINUS SELECT /*+ index(t I_DEPT1) */ deptno, dname FROM dept t;
需要保证该查询的执行计划确实使用了受损的索引,可以通过查看执行计划中是否有I_DEPT1来确认。
ORA-8102即可能是ORACLE的bug,也可能是由于硬件I/O错误所引起。
硬件或者I/O子系统由于丢失写 Lost Write造成块的逻辑上讹误,当一个Lost Io发生,包含对key的修改或者没有写入到ORACLE数据文件上,这即可能发生在表块上也可能发生在索引块上。
对于 ORA-8102的解决
如果自己搞不定可以找诗檀软件专业ORACLE数据库修复团队成员帮您恢复!
诗檀软件专业数据库修复团队
服务热线 : 13764045638 QQ号:47079569 邮箱:service@parnassusdata.com
若已经确认是由于表和索引间的不一致引起的ORA-8102,则drop和重建索引可以解决大部分情况。
但是如果确认是表上存在的损坏,则解决方法可以是 单独修复表上的损坏块 或者 考虑重建表。
如果发生错误的是LOB Index,则移动LOB并重建LOB INDEX
alter table &table_owner.&table_with_lob move LOB (&&lob_column) store as (tablespace &tablespace_name);
NB | Bug | Fixed | Description |
14222244 | 11.2.0.4, 12.1.0.1 | Adding a column with DEFAULT and NOT NULL constraint disabled causes problems – superseded | |
13073122 | 11.2.0.4, 12.1.0.1 | ORA-8102 signaled by q000* processes operating on queues with retention | |
+ | 17761775 | 11.2.0.3.9, 11.2.0.3.BP22, 11.2.0.4.BP03, 12.1.0.2 | ORA-600 [kclchkblkdma_3] ORA-600 [3020] or ORA-600 [kcbchg1_16] Join of temp and permanent table in RAC might lead to corruption |
17449815 | 12.1.0.2, 12.2.0.0 | ORA-8102 ORA-1499 after ORA-1/ORA-2291 by MERGE with DML ERROR LOGGING | |
16844448 | 11.2.0.3.9, 11.2.0.3.BP22, 11.2.0.4, 12.1.0.2 | ORA-600 [3020] after flashback database in a RAC | |
13708951 | 11.2.0.4, 12.1.0.1 | ORA-8102 on UPDATE statement with subquery for an indexed column | |
13146182 | 11.2.0.2.11, 11.2.0.2.BP17, 11.2.0.3.BP07, 11.2.0.4, 12.1.0.1 | ORA-1499 ORA-8102 ORA-600 [kdsgrp1] Bitmap Index / Table mismatch | |
P | 12330911 | 12.1.0.1 | EXADATA LSI firmware for lost writes |
11778458 | 11.2.0.3, 12.1.0.1 | Wrong Results / ORA-1802 on TO_CHAR with CURSOR_SHARING | |
10633840 | 11.2.0.2.7, 11.2.0.2.BP17, 11.2.0.3, 12.1.0.1 | ORA-1502 on insert statement on INTERVAL partitioned table. ORA-8102 / ORA-1499 Index inconsistency | |
10245259 | 11.2.0.2.BP03, 11.2.0.3, 12.1.0.1 | PARALLEL INSERT with +NOAPPEND hint or if PARALLEL INSERT plan is executed in SERIAL corrupts index and causes wrong results | |
+ | 10209232 | 11.1.0.7.7, 11.2.0.1.BP08, 11.2.0.2.1, 11.2.0.2.BP02, 11.2.0.2.GIBUNDLE01, 11.2.0.3, 12.1.0.1 | ORA-1578 / ORA-600 [3020] Corruption. Misplaced Blocks and Lost Write in ASM |
+ | 9734539 | 11.2.0.2, 12.1.0.1 | ORA-8102 / ORA-1499 corrupt index after update/merge using QUERY REWRITE |
+ | 9469117 | 10.2.0.5.4, 11.2.0.1.BP04, 11.2.0.2, 12.1.0.1 | Corrupt index after PDML executed in serial. Wrong results. OERI[kdsgrp1]/ORA-1499 by analyze |
+ | 9231605 | 11.1.0.7.4, 11.2.0.1.3, 11.2.0.1.BP02, 11.2.0.2, 12.1.0.1 | Block corruption with missing row on a compressed table after DELETE |
+ | 8951812 | 11.2.0.2, 12.1.0.1 | Corrupt index by rebuild online. Possible OERI [kddummy_blkchk] by SMON |
8847637 | 11.2.0.3, 12.1.0.1 | ORA-7445[kxibPut] caused by merge stmt and online index rebuild | |
8720802 | 10.2.0.5, 11.2.0.1.BP07, 11.2.0.2, 12.1.0.1 | Add check for row piece pointing to itself (db_block_checking,dbv,rman,analyze) | |
+ | 8546356 | 10.2.0.5.1, 11.2.0.1.3, 11.2.0.1.BP07, 11.2.0.2, 12.1.0.1 | ORA-8102/ORA-1499/OERI[kdsgrp1] Composite Partitioned Index corruption after rebuild ONLINE in RAC |
7710827 | 11.2.0.2, 12.1.0.1 | Index rebuild or Merge partition causes wrong results in concurrent reads instead of ORA-8103 | |
7705591 | 10.2.0.5, 11.2.0.1.1, 11.2.0.1.BP04, 11.2.0.2, 12.1.0.1 | Corruption with self-referenced row in MSSM tablespace. Wrong Results / OERI[6749] / ORA-8102 | |
+ | 17752121 | 11.2.0.3.9, 11.2.0.3.BP22, 11.2.0.4.BP03 | ORA-600 [kclchkblkdma_3] ORA-600 [3020] RAC diagnostic/fix to avoid a block being modified in Shared Mode and prevent corruption |
16922996 | 11.2.0.4 | ORA-8102 ORA-1499 Internal rollback in Parallel DML may cause index inconsistency | |
8588540 | 11.1.0.7.2, 11.2.0.1 | Corruption / ORA-8102 in RAC with loopback DB links between instances | |
8514561 | 11.2.0.1 | ORA-8102 updating a table with function based index and TYPE columns and a TRIGGER | |
+ | 7329252 | 10.2.0.4.4, 10.2.0.5, 11.1.0.7.5, 11.2.0.1 | ORA-8102/ORA-1499/OERI[kdsgrp1] Index corruption after rebuild index ONLINE |
6057203 | 10.2.0.4, 11.1.0.7, 11.2.0.1 | Corruption with zero length column (ZLC) / OERI [kcbchg1_6] from Parallel update | |
5621677 | 10.2.0.4, 11.1.0.6 | Logical corruption with PARALLEL update | |
5181547 | 10.2.0.4, 11.1.0.6 | Index corruption after insert-only merge /*+ append */ or PDML into table | |
5179313 | 10.2.0.4, 11.1.0.6 | INSERT /*append parallel*/ can corrupt an index | |
4883635 | 10.2.0.4, 11.1.0.6 | MERGE (with DELETE) can produce wrong results or Logical corruption in chained rows | |
* | 4570793 | 10.2.0.2 | Index corruption from array inserts (ORA-8102/ORA-1499) |
4246090 | 9.2.0.8, 10.1.0.5, 10.2.0.1 | IOT corruption from buffered INSERT with function based index (ORA-8102) | |
3573604 | 10.1.0.4, 10.2.0.1 | A transported bitmap index can give various OERI errors / ORA-8102 | |
3365045 | 9.2.0.6, 10.1.0.3, 10.2.0.1 | Functional index on DATE column can depend on NLS_DATE_FORMAT (ORA-8102 on DML) | |
3352413 | 9.2.0.6, 10.1.0.3, 10.2.0.1 | An ORA-8102 error can occur on ATEMPIND$ during a user UPDATE with CONSTRAINTS | |
3069818 | 10.1.0.4, 10.2.0.1, 9.2.0.6 | Corruption possible modifying a migrated or chained row | |
2485931 | 9.2.0.2, 10.1.0.2 | ORA-8102 from IOT DML with concurrent MOVE ONLINE | |
2293492 | 9.0.1.4, 9.2.0.2, 10.1.0.2 | Fatal error during COMMIT / ROLLBACK may cause permanent corruption (eg: ORA-8102) | |
2511906 | 9.2.0.2 | ORA-8102 possible on update of IOT | |
2405013 | 9.2.0.2 | ORA-8102 on ALTER TABLE MOVE PARTITION COMPRESS UPDATE GLOBAL INDEXES | |
2271722 | 9.0.1.4, 9.2.0.1 | ORA-8102 possible on update of IOT with OVERFLOW | |
2165461 | 9.2.0.1 | Direct load to table with DESCENDING index may cause subsequent ORA-8102 errors | |
2131767 | 9.2.0.1 | Parallel create of FUNCTIONAL INDEX on PARTITION table can product corrupt index (ORA-8102) | |
2456255 | 9.0.1.0 | ORA-8102 on DELETE from PARTITIONED table with index | |
1667103 | 8.1.7.2, 9.0.1.0 | Update of an IOT with CONCATENATION using a SECONDARY index signals ORA-8102 | |
1388843 | 8.1.7.3, 9.0.1.0 | UNIQUE/PK constraints ENFORCED with NON-UNIQUE COMPRESSED indexes allow duplicates / ORA-8102 | |
536567 | 7.3.4.4, 8.0.4.3, 8.0.5.1, 8.0.6.0 | Corrupt index from PARALLEL Index build/rebuild of CONCAT index if FFS used and leading columns are NULL. |